mistakenvalkyrie

whyyoustabbedme

why in the world are we still asking this question in 2019?

now-exiting-fuckability

Trump: says and does racist things.

People: call Trump racist.

Journalists and politicians:

shadesoforlando

Ok but like

There’s no benefit in her going on live television and saying Trump is a racist without elaborating on the subject

What he’s asking is a leading question and sure, taking his ‘how can you say that’ out of context works well to make him seem like he supports Trump but that’s not how it was said in the interview. How it was said was to get her to continue to talk about why Trump is a racist

Don’t believe me? Skip ahead in this video to 0:15 seconds and listen to the entire thing in context.

She then goes on to ELABORATE on how he uses dogwhistles and his reaction to Charlottesville (by calling Nazi’s fine people) so people who tune in to the interview can draw connections to what she’s saying as opposed to just reacting, like op did, to the exact words that are said.

I think too many people on here fail to realize that news, real news, isn’t done by just saying shit. You have to be able to back it up and in order to do so, you need to be able to spell something out for people who don’t get it. And someone who already has been criticized by people for her views (including by people on here, bizarrely, because they keep things she’s said out of context) need to be able to get all the information out there.

cryingcucumber

(i agree he couldve phrased it better, maybe just “can you explain why” but yea he’s def not pro trump…)

zenkaiankoku

He said it that way to emulate the offense Trump supports respond with. He didnt need to prove he was on her side. He needed her to explain her point in a way that was clear to /both/ sides. Basically he wanted her to explain it as if she was talking to someone who didnt think Trump was racist. Please dont take him out of context guys. He gives people like her a platform without using it to humiliate or fight them.

positivity-roses

Making fun of girls who dream of being a wife and stay-at-home-mom actually doesn’t make you progressive or feminist or cool, it just makes you a person who shits on someone else’s dream, a.k.a an asshole

weareallweirdhumans

Whenever someone says that I say “Okay, whatever floats your boat, I guess” and then I think “Why would she want that? Isn’t it boring to just sit around all day and do nothing?”

ablogforyoungmommys

Moms don’t “sit around all day and do nothing” - they have a incredibly important 24/7 job: raising little human beings. Don’t devalue that by calling it “nothing”.

shaycode

Man, my mom cooked, cleaned, paid the bills, went grocery shopping, did my hair every morning before school and every night (which, as a white woman with no prior experience of doing black hair, especially on a tender-headed child, is no easy feat). She helped with my homework, consoled me after a bad day, frequently volunteered at the school. She even picked my anxious, crying ass up from kindergarten early nearly every day for the first semester and would lie down with me every night when I was a child until I fell asleep (and that usually took several hours). That’s not even scratching the surface of all the things she’s done for me and my siblings. She was always the first person up and the last person to go to bed. Nothing about what she did, and continues to do to a lesser degree, is easy.

corihasastory

Domestic work is constantly undervalued even though every family depends on it. My grandmother on my mom’s side would go hungry just so her kids could eat - that is not nothing.

Also, if you would commend a man for being a stay at home dad and doing exactly what women have been doing for centuries, don’t pretend you care about women’s labor.

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.